Official Trailer for ‘V/H/S/99’ Is Larger Than Life! [Video]
‘V/H/S/85’ – Franchise Rewinds Back to the 1980s!
‘Teen Wolf: The Movie’ and Spinoff Series “Wolf Pack” Premiering in January 2023 [Teasers]
Netflix’s “The Midnight Club” Sets Guinness World Record for Jump Scares in Single Episode
‘Alone in the Dark’ Review – Terror on Tubi Opens With an Uneven Stalker Thriller
‘Teen Wolf: The Movie’ and Spinoff Series “Wolf Pack” Premiering in January 2023 [Teasers]
‘The Penguin’ – ‘The Hunt’ Filmmaker Craig Zobel Directing HBO Max Spinoff Series
‘Something Is Killing the Children’ – Mike Flanagan No Longer Involved in Netflix Adaptation
“Chainsaw Man” Review – Premiere Episode Revs Up Devil Hunter Carnage with Quirky Humor
“Folklore” Season 2 Review – Asian Horror Anthology Returns with More Cultural Scares
‘Alone in the Dark’ Review – Terror on Tubi Opens With an Uneven Stalker Thriller
“Chainsaw Man” Review – Premiere Episode Revs Up Devil Hunter Carnage with Quirky Humor
“Folklore” Season 2 Review – Asian Horror Anthology Returns with More Cultural Scares
“The Midnight Club” Review – Mike Flanagan Embraces Christopher Pike and the Power of Storytelling
‘Monster High: The Movie’ Review – Nickelodeon’s High School Musical Is a Cute Monster Mash for Tweens
‘Incident at Loch Ness’ – Werner Herzog Finds Nessie in Cryptid Mockumentary [Horrors Elsewhere]
‘The Midnight Club’ – All the Christopher Pike Stories the Netflix Series Adapts
10 ‘Scooby-Doo!’ Episodes and Movies That Are Perfect for Halloween!
The Queer Horror of “Chucky”: Episode 2.01 – “Halloween 2”
‘Buffy’ Tie-In Novel “Halloween Rain” Pits the Slayer Against Samhain [Buried in a Book]
Official Trailer for ‘V/H/S/99’ Is Larger Than Life! [Video]
CIA Experiments on Citizens in Conspiracy Thriller ‘MK Ultra’ [Trailer]
‘A Savannah Haunting’ Trailer Haunted Voodoo and Ghosts [Exclusive]
“Anne Rice’s Mayfair Witches” Official Trailer – AMC+ Series Premieres in January 2023
‘The Super Mario Bros. Movie’ Trailer Teases a Trip to ‘Luigi’s Mansion’?!
‘Silent Hill’ Film Director Christophe Gans States That Multiple ‘Silent Hill’ Games Are in Development
‘Dead by Daylight’ Gets Into the Halloween Spirit With “Haunted by Daylight” Event [Trailer]
‘Resident Evil’ Fan Series Takes a Dark Comedy Approach in “S.T.A.R.S” [Watch]
‘SCP: Secret Files’ Review – Anthology Game Nails the Spirit of the SCP Foundation Source Material
‘Hello Puppets: Midnight Show’ Launches on Steam October 19th
Two of the greatest and most successful horror films made in the wave that followed the successes of Dracula, Frankenstein, and Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde in 1931 were virtually lost for much of the ninety years since their release. It is true that the black and white versions of Doctor X (1932) and Mystery of the Wax Museum (1933) remained in circulation in various forms for much of that time, but the original Process 2 Technicolor versions were thought to be gone forever or at least damaged beyond repair.
The films have much more than this in common. Both share much of the same talent both in front of and behind the camera as well as similarities in tone and character. They are the first horror films made in color and examples of early horror-comedies. They are also prime examples of “pre-code” horror with the most subversive moments generally used for comedic effect than the more sexually transgressive Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Because these films remain relatively underseen compared to other great horror films of the era, the twists and turns of their plots will not be revealed here, but it is my hope that interest in seeing them will be piqued.
The films are considered the apex of Process 2 Technicolor, often referred to as “two-strip” Technicolor, though this is technically incorrect. In Process 2, a prism behind the camera lens exposes two frames of a single strip of black and white film at the same time, one through a green filter, the other through red. The frames exposed in green were then printed onto one strip of black and white film and the red onto another with the two strips of film glued together back-to-back and a dye transfer technique used for the final version. The result is a unique image that emphasizes eerie greens and rosy pink hues.
Both films were directed by perhaps the greatest journeyman director of classic cinema, Michael Curtiz, who worked in every genre imaginable and is responsible for some of the greatest films of all time including Captain Blood (1935), The Adventures of Robin Hood, Angels with Dirty Faces (both 1938), Yankee Doodle Dandy, Casablanca (both 1942), Mildred Pierce (1945), and White Christmas (1954) among many others. He made one other horror film in addition to these two, The Walking Dead (1936), an underrated gem starring Boris Karloff as a wrongly-executed prisoner who is raised from the dead by a scientist.
Curtiz was by all accounts a demanding director who worked his casts and crews long hours in the days before the Screen Actor’s Guild and other Hollywood unions. Fay Wray summed up the feelings of many by saying, “he was like part of the camera. He was very efficient and I could respect that. But I didn’t like him and I didn’t think he was a good or very nice person.” Despite this, Curtiz was also greatly respected for his work ethic and the results he brought to the screen. Though not primarily known for horror, Curtiz clearly had a knack for it and created sequences of great mood and tension balanced with humor and romance.
Pictured: ‘Mystery of the Wax Museum’
The sequence in Mystery of the Wax Museum in which Fay Wray is directed into danger by Lionel Atwill as Eigor is one of the most effective in either film and a showcase for Curtiz’s ability to handle suspense. The Expressionistic angles of the sets coupled with the green tinges provided by the Process 2 Technicolor visuals are unsettling. We know she is stepping ever closer to a deadly trap as she walks the stairs and corridors below the museum, encountering macabre sculptures and mysterious passages along the way. The monster reveal that follows this is one of the greatest of the era, though unsung compared to the unmasking of Lon Chaney’s Phantom or Karloff’s turn in the doorway in Frankenstein.
Also behind the camera of both films was cinematographer Ray Rennahan, legendary Art Director Anton Grot, and editor George Amy. Rennahan was a key figure in the Process 2 Technicolor process as he filmed several successful tests as it was being developed and shot several films with it. This expertise was invaluable in creating the look and mood of the film through color, light, and shadow. Grot would work with Curtiz for well over a decade, from Noah’s Ark in 1928 all the way to Mildred Pierce in 1945. His German Expressionism by way of Art Deco sets are inventive and instantly iconic as well as clear influences on designs in films ranging from The Corman Poe Cycle and The Abominable Dr. Phibes (1971) to any number of James Bond villain lairs.
Topping the casts are Lionel Atwill and Fay Wray, both at the height of their respective successes. Atwill offers a great deal of gravitas to his roles as Dr. Xavier in Doctor X and Ivan Eigor in Mystery, while Wray is luminous as Xavier’s daughter Joanne and the love interest of one of Eigor’s apprentices Charlotte Duncan. Atwill would soon become a horror veteran making memorable turns in Murders in the Zoo (1933) as the mad millionaire Eric Gorman and Son of Frankenstein (1939) as the one-armed Inspector Krogh. As the brilliant and kindly Dr. Xavier in Doctor X, Atwill is hardly the typical “mad scientist,” but is able to flex his villainous muscle in Mystery of the Wax Museum. In both cases, his portrayals are nuanced, leaving a great deal of question as to his motives throughout both films. Doctor X would be the first in a five-film run for Fay Wray that would crown her the first Scream Queen. In fact, her first scream in a horror film is heard in Doctor X. Though her role in neither film is as memorable as that of Ann Darrow in King Kong (1933), she serves as the tender, feeling heart of both.
Despite being third billed in both films, it is the fast-talking reporters that drive much of the action in them. In Doctor X, this role is Lee Taylor played by comedian Lee Tracy, who first came to prominence on Broadway in the original stage play of the newspaper comedy/drama The Front Page and became typecast as a reporter from then on. In Doctor X, he is a jokester with a Lou Costello-style “fraidy-cat” persona. As Taylor investigates the cannibalistic “Full Moon Killer,” he is gassed as he spies on Dr. Xavier’s lie detector test, falls in love with his daughter, and buzzes every character he can with a joy buzzer along the way. He provides most of the comedy of the film and perhaps overbalances it in that direction a bit. The greatest joy of Doctor X is how unbelievably bonkers it ends up being, especially for such an early horror film. It deals with cannibalism, bizarre electrical and chemical apparatus, outlandish pseudoscience, and synthetic flesh, but not a great deal of subtlety. The decision to lean into the comedy perhaps works in this case simply because of the odd intricacies and absurdities of the plot, which all add up to a very fun and entertaining, if not particularly scary film.
In Mystery of the Wax Museum, the reporter role is taken up by Glenda Farrell as Florence Dempsey. Farrell is a no-nonsense, hard-boiled career woman, constantly at odds with her editor, Jim (Frank McHugh) whom she refers to as “Poison Ivy.” Her role is not pure comedy as Tracy’s is in Doctor X. She is funny but also provides suspense and drama to the story. Based on her performance in the film, Farrell was chosen to play another reporter, Torchy Blane in Smart Blonde (1937) which would spawn a series of Torchy Blane films. Superman co-creator Jerry Siegel was so taken by Farrell’s performance that he acknowledged that it inspired the creation of Lois Lane, whose name was taken from Lola Lane, another actress to play the character. The character is also a likely inspiration (along with Torchy Blane) on Rosalind Russell’s Hildy Johnson in His Girl Friday (1940), a more comedic remake of The Front Page. Farrell may not technically be the star of Mystery of the Wax Museum, but she certainly steals the show.
As previously mentioned, both Doctor X and Mystery of the Wax Museum are prime examples of Pre-Code horror. Though the term Pre-Code is generally used to describe sound films made in Hollywood between 1930 and 1934, this is something of a misnomer. The Production Code was put into effect in 1930 as a means of regulating film content from within rather than through oversight by the U.S. government as was being considered. Between the establishment of the Code and the beginning of its enforcement under Joseph Breen in June of 1934, filmmakers would often purposefully include elements that defied the code. Local jurisdictions would them often censor films for their regional markets, leading to various cuts of films being shown in different parts of the country, not to mention the international markets, which were generally more strict. Warner Brothers was not quite so bold in breaking the Code as Paramount, whose Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde and Island of Lost Souls have already been discussed in previous installments of this column. At most studios, changes were made during the scripting process. Still, both films are filled with pre-code touches involving heroin, liquor, pornography, and premarital sex, not to mention cannibalism and on-screen depictions of criminal activities, all forbidden by the as yet unenforced Production Code.
However, many films made during the pre-code era ran into censorship when it came to reissuing films after 1934. This is one reason why both Doctor X and Mystery of the Wax Museum were very nearly lost forever. Mystery received a re-release approval certificate in 1936 but Doctor X did not for being “too gruesome,” particularly for its mentions of cannibalism and its long synthetic flesh transformation sequence. Jack Warner attempted to reissue the films again in the early forties as Universal once again was finding great success with horror, but was pressured to withdraw them both. As a result, the films were out of circulation for quite some time. In 1956, they were officially “lost” when an inventory resulted in no copies of either film being found. In 1970, Jack Warner discovered nitrate prints of both films in his private vault, though both were badly damaged. The prints would go missing again for some time before being rediscovered in 1983 and the first attempts at restoration were made, which produced unsatisfactory results.
Fortunately, modern restoration techniques have restored these films to their former glory, made them available on Blu-ray through Warner Archive, and ripe for rediscovery.
Pictured: ‘Mystery of the Wax Museum’
In Bride of Frankenstein, Dr. Pretorius, played by the inimitable Ernest Thesiger, raises his glass and proposes a toast to Colin Clive’s Henry Frankenstein—“to a new world of Gods and Monsters.” I invite you to join me in exploring this world, focusing on horror films from the dawn of the Universal Monster movies in 1931 to the collapse of the studio system and the rise of the new Hollywood rebels in the late 1960’s. With this period as our focus, and occasional ventures beyond, we will explore this magnificent world of classic horror. So, I raise my glass to you and invite you to join me in the toast.
Are We Not Men? – ‘Island of Lost Souls’ and What It Means to Be Human
We Could Have Been Friends: The Prison of Bitterness in ‘What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?’
Resurrection: ‘The Curse of Frankenstein’ and the Rebirth of Gothic Horror
During a pivotal moment in Incident at Loch Ness, Zak Penn repeats something Werner Herzog supposedly once told him: “Cinema is lies.” This comes after the discovery of Penn’s meddling on Herzog’s latest project. The filmmaker then tells Penn he should become a talk show host or lawyer if he can’t understand the distinction here. While these two storytellers both aim to make a good movie, they are worlds apart in their methods. Herzog seeks utmost accuracy and has a staunch sense of integrity. Penn, on the other hand, is a man of Hollywood’s conditioning. He believes audiences will never be satisfied by just the truth.
Deception is the central theme of this 2004 movie. Even before the camera ever started rolling, the minds behind Incident at Loch Ness had people fooled; outlets back then reported Herzog was shooting a mere documentary called “The Enigma of Loch Ness”. As everyone later realized, Herzog and his team were all along making a pseudo-documentary about Scotland’s most famous lake. Attaching a name like Herzog lends credibility to any project, so it’s understandable why no one suspected “Enigma” to be anything but legitimate.
The elaborate ruse begins with Herzog having a casual gathering of friends and colleagues at his home in Los Angeles before leaving for Scotland. There’s some business in the mix as well, seeing as producer Penn shows up along with cinematographer Gabriel Beristain. Herzog and his co-stars mainly improvise and work off a “scriptment” to avoid coming across as over-rehearsed. And no one is more devoted to the veil of artifice than the star himself; Herzog tells Beristain there won’t be any need for a “lighting package” because this is, after all, a documentary.
Incident at Loch Ness arouses suspicions after Herzog reaches the Scottish Highlands. Between a growing cast of oddballs and a music score to match, the movie gradually abandons the sincerity seen earlier on, only to then feel like a toned-down episode of Curb Your Enthusiasm . Everyone keeps a straight face through it all, yet their performances are undermined by a number of things that betray Penn’s ultimate ploy. The dishonest producer (really the director) is in fact orchestrating this entire production, and it’s not long before he lets the audience in on the secret. Meanwhile, Herzog remains in the dark until it’s too late to abandon the whole project.
Any hope for a bona-fide documentary is apparently off the table as soon as Herzog realizes his producer has been deceiving him. From having a Playboy model ( Kitana Baker) play a “sonar expert” to passing a cryptid fanatic ( Michael Karnow) off as a real professor, Incident at Loch Ness steers farther and farther away from shore. This movie-within-a-movie-within-a-movie only resumes operations once there’s an actual sighting in the loch; Penn swears he didn’t stage this. And with that suspicious wake in the water, the story gets back on track as well as takes on an urgent tone.
Everyone, but especially Penn, gets a karmic surprise when their antics on the loch have stirred up more than the truth. No, the Discovery IV — Penn renamed the rental boat so it would sound “more authentic” — has attracted the attention of something big beneath the surface. And Penn throwing a Nessie-shaped prop into the water for some easy money shots has only turned the boat and crew into moving targets. The murky aesthetic of Loch Ness comes into full swing as the Discovery IV struggles to escape the unseen hunter on its tail; the boat can’t go very fast since Penn, all for the sake of filming, foolishly replaced the original engine with a smaller and quieter one.
Incident at Loch Ness works diligently to keep the audience trustful, even as the trickery becomes obvious. And much like a captain who goes down with the ship, Herzog neither shows signs of fatigue nor cracks a smile as the grim conclusion draws near. The movie owes much of its success to Herzog’s commitment to the bit. The movie started off as an amusing carousel of quirky characters and feasible nonsense, but the last act finally delivers a surprising horror element. The digital effects are impressive enough to be passed off as genuine, and Penn, as the director, understands the value of the “less is more” approach.
Herzog has been vocal about his feelings toward cinéma-vérité , a style of filmmaking he accuses of reaching “a merely superficial truth.” From his 1999 manifesto called The Minnesota Declaration , Herzog said “filmmakers of cinéma-vérité resemble tourists who take pictures amid ancient ruins of facts.” Knowing this, Incident at Loch Ness is even more entertaining to watch. The movie not only prods the contentious style but it’s also a joke at Herzog’s expense. The filmmaker is regarded for his ability to dig well below the surface of people and situations, yet he’s become the victim of half-truths for most of his career. This phony voyage to find the Loch Ness monster ends up being a clever satire rather than a shallow case of hypocrisy.
Incident at Loch Ness is the most unique movie about Nessie largely because it’s not about Nessie at all. This is a meeting of two larger-than-life myths, not to mention a demonstration of the scrutiny each one has faced. People today may see through Herzog’s attempt at verisimilitude after having watched their fair share of found footage and deepfakes since this movie’s release. However, knowing it’s a total sham doesn’t take away from one’s enjoyment. If anything, understanding it’s an exercise in hoaxes makes the movie even better.
Horrors Elsewhere is a recurring column that spotlights a variety of movies from all around the globe, particularly those not from the United States. Fears may not be universal, but one thing is for sure — a scream is understood, always and everywhere.
You must be logged in to post a comment.